Photo by Thirdman
Mesothelioma, a deadly cancer associated with asbestos exposure, has traditionally been viewed as a disease that predominantly affects men, particularly those engaged in heavy labor industries. However, a disconcerting trend has emerged – the number of mesothelioma cases among women is on the rise.
Despite an overall decrease in asbestos use since the 1980s, mesothelioma-related deaths in women have surged by 25 percent over the past two decades. In this article, we will explore some of the reasons behind this unexpected increase, examining potential causes, occupational implications, and the pressing need for heightened awareness within the medical community.
Understanding Mesothelioma in Women
Mesothelioma is a fast-progressing cancer that affects the mesothelium, a thin layer safeguarding internal organs. Traditionally linked to occupational exposure in male-dominated fields like construction and manufacturing, the dynamics are shifting.
Women with non-traditional asbestos exposure sources are increasingly receiving mesothelioma diagnoses. One contributing factor is the smaller size of women’s lungs and respiratory systems, leading to increased fiber retention and, as a result, a greater likelihood of tumor development.
Early diagnosis remains crucial for better survival rates among women. However, understanding the causes, available treatments, and legal avenues for those affected is equally important if we’re going to tackle this rising health concern effectively.
A Look at the Alarming Statistics
Recent studies reveal a startling increase in annual mesothelioma deaths among women, soaring from 489 in 1999 to 614 in 2020. The majority of these cases, affecting women aged 25 and older, were predominantly found in the 55 and older age group.
Pleural, peritoneal, and pericardial mesothelioma were the most common types, with Louisiana, Maine, Minnesota, Montana, Oregon, Washington, and Wisconsin reporting death rates surpassing 6.0 per 1 million women.
These numbers highlight a big shift in the landscape of mesothelioma, demanding a closer examination of the health and occupational implications for women.
The Changing Face of Occupational Exposure
As previously mentioned, mesothelioma cases in men are typically closely tied to occupational exposure in construction and manufacturing. However, recent research underscores a paradigm shift in the causes for women.
Here’s a surprising finding: The majority of mesothelioma-related deaths among women are now attributed to homemakers. Health care and social assistance, notably within professions like nursing and teaching, have become unexpected hotspots for asbestos exposure as well.
Roles like registered nurses and school teachers, once not associated with asbestos exposure, now find themselves at risk. This shift ultimately tells us we need to reevaluate occupational safety standards and create awareness to protect women in these professions. (Though much of the damage has already been done, as asbestos exposure has been significantly curtailed in recent decades.)
Protective Measures for Women
In the face of this alarming trend, understanding how women can protect themselves from asbestos exposure is crucial. Leading mesothelioma medical centers continue to explore and refine treatments such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation. And emerging therapies, like immunotherapy, electric fields, and gene therapy, are also gaining traction. But there’s still no known cure – only treatment to extend quality of life among those affected.
Victims of mesothelioma resulting from corporate negligence may be entitled to financial compensation, which does serve as some sense of justice for family and loved ones. It can also lessen the burden of care, as settlements may cover treatment costs, medications, clinical trials, and caregiver services.
The Dubious Role of Asbestos in Unlikely Places
A recent discovery of asbestos in the Federal Correctional Institution in Dublin, California, raises concerns about potential exposure in unexpected settings. The Federal Bureau of Prisons’ failure to conduct an asbestos examination violates the EPA Clean Air Act. And this oversight emphasizes the need for stringent regulations and highlights the legal options available to victims affected by corporate misconduct, regardless of the setting. (Interestingly, it was women who were most impacted by this specific case.)
Public Health Implications and Future Directions
The escalating number of mesothelioma deaths among women calls for a comprehensive approach to mitigate risks associated with asbestos exposure. Efforts to limit exposure, especially among women have to become a focus, as the Dublin situation proves exposure is not just an issue limited to the past. Awareness campaigns, occupational safety measures, and continued research are key components of what has to be a concerted effort to decrease mortality rates in the future.
Where We Go From Here
The increase in mesothelioma cases among women in recent years has challenged the norms, demanding a deeper exploration of both the causes and implications. The shift, underscored by some rather alarming statistics, highlights the need for proactive measures. As we deal with this evolving landscape, a combination of awareness, legal recourse, and continued research is essential. The hope would be that we’re sitting here in 15 or 20 years talking about a sharp decline in mesothelioma cases for both women and men alike.